Why reliability metrics must dictate advanced-node physical implementation flow

<img width="1224" height="456" src="https://www.edn.com/wp-content/uploads/Hero-image-46.jpg?fit=1224%2C456" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 5px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" fetchpriority="high" srcset="https://www.edn.com/wp-content/uploads/Hero-image-46.jpg?w=1224 1224w, https://www.edn.com/wp-content/uploads/Hero-image-46.jpg?w=300 300w, https://www.edn.com/wp-content/uploads/Hero-image-46.jpg?w=768 768w, https://www.edn.com/wp-content/uploads/Hero-image-46.jpg?w=1024 1024w" sizes="(max-width: 1224px) 100vw, 1224px" /><p>Dynamic voltage drops, electromigration, and timing are not three axes to be optimized in sequence; they are one physical system.</p> <p>The post <a href="https://www.edn.com/why-reliability-metrics-must-dictate-advanced-node-physical-implementation-flow/">Why reliability metrics must dictate advanced-node physical implementation flow</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.edn.com">EDN</a>.</p>